It’s time to take a look at the line between “pet” and
“animal.” When the ASPCA sends an agent to the home of a Brooklyn family to
arrest one of its members for allegedly killing a hamster, something is wrong.
That “something” is this: we protect “companion animals”
like hamsters while largely ignoring what amounts to the torture of chickens
and cows and pigs. In short, if I keep a pig as a pet, I can’t kick it. If I
keep a pig I intend to sell for food, I can pretty much torture it. State laws
known as “Common Farming Exemptions” allow industry — rather than lawmakers —
to make any practice legal as long as it’s common. “In other words,” as
Jonathan Safran Foer, the author of “Eating Animals,” wrote me via e-mail, “the
industry has the power to define cruelty. It’s every bit as crazy as giving
burglars the power to define trespassing.”
Meanwhile, there are pet police. So when 19-year-old
Monique Smith slammed her sibling’s hamster on the floor and killed it,
as she may have done in a fit of rage last week, an ASPCA agent — there are 18
of them, busily responding to animal cruelty calls in the five boroughs and
occasionally beyond — arrested her. (The charges were later dropped, though Ms.
Smith spent a night in jail at Rikers Island.)
In light of the way most animals are treated in this
country, I’m pretty sure that ASPCA agents don’t need to spend their time in
Brooklyn defending rodents.
In fact, there’s no rationality to be found here. Just a
few blocks from Ms. Smith’s home, along the M subway line, the city routinely
is poisoning rodents as quickly and futilely as it possibly can, though rats
can be pets also. But that’s hardly the point. This is: we “process” (that
means kill) nearly 10 billion animals annually in this country, approximately
one-sixth of the world’s total.
To read more on this story, click here: Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others
